beta
Text
1. Defendant C is the Defendant with respect to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 29,484,00, Defendant D’s KRW 38,102,400, and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Determination as to Plaintiff B’s claim against Defendant D
A. On July 21, 2010, Plaintiff B entered into a lease agreement with Defendant D on KRW 34,248,000 for lease deposit, monthly rent of KRW 756,00 for the second floor of “E” owned by the said Plaintiff, and Defendant D, a lessee, did not pay monthly rent. As such, Plaintiff B claimed for payment of unpaid rent of KRW 27,216,00 for late rent of KRW 38,86,40 for late rent of KRW 10,86,40 for late rent of KRW 38,102,40 for late rent of KRW 27,216,00 for late rent of KRW 10,86,40 for late rent of KRW 38,102,40 for late payment for
(b) Judgment on deemed confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim against Defendant C
A. Basic facts 1) The Financial Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter “the instant association”) promoted a reconstruction project that newly constructs an aggregate building, which is an aggregate building, on the ground of 4,144.3m2 in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), which is the Gu G and H site, and the urgnb C&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “RagnbC”) concluded a comprehensive implementation contract with the instant association to perform all duties related to the said reconstruction project by delegation.
B) Plaintiff A entered into a sales contract with the instant trade association for the divided stores in the instant commercial building, and thereafter completed registration of ownership preservation for the divided stores in lots. C) Defendant C entered into a lease contract for the right to lease of the divided stores in the instant commercial building and thereafter the lessee who entered into a lease contract with Plaintiff A.
2) Plaintiff A entered into a sales contract and a lease contract for the instant shopping mall prior to the construction of the instant shopping mall. Plaintiff A entered into a sales contract for the instant shopping mall prior to the construction of the shopping mall.
The above sales contract is about the owner of the divided shop in the commercial building of this case as to the above divided shop in the telecom.