logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.08.09 2017고단505
근로기준법위반등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

I. The Defendant is an employer who operates restaurant business as a representative of D in the Hanam-gun C, Hanam-gun, the 2017 Highest 505 charges of this case.

1. From December 17, 2014, the Defendant was employed by the Defendant and worked in the above restaurant, and on April 16, 2017, the Defendant did not pay the Defendant’s total wages of KRW 1,806,670 on December 12, 2016 of the victim E, retired on April 16, 2017, KRW 2,80,000 on February 2, 2017, KRW 2,800,000 on February 2, 2017, KRW 2,80,800 on March 3, 2013, KRW 1,493,30 on April 1, 2017, including KRW 11,70,000 on April 30, 2017, and KRW 20,523,300 on the date of retirement between the parties without agreement on the extension of payment period between the parties.

2. From December 17, 2014, the Defendant was employed by the Defendant and worked in the above restaurant, and on April 16, 2017, the Defendant did not pay KRW 9,554,261 in total as well as KRW 6,608,508 of the retirement allowances of the victim E, retired on April 16, 2017, as indicated in the statement of the money and valuables in arrears among individuals, within 14 days from the date of retirement, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment

"2017 Highest 526"

1. From March 7, 2016, the Defendant was employed by the Defendant and worked in the said restaurant, and was retired on March 18, 2017, the Defendant did not pay KRW 1,070,330 of the victim F, who retired on March 18, 2017, wages of KRW 2,60,000, wage of February 2, 2017, wage of KRW 1,509,670, wage of KRW 5,180,000 within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on extension of the payment period.

2. From March 7, 2016, the Defendant was employed by the Defendant and worked in the above restaurant, and on March 18, 2017, the Defendant did not pay KRW 2,685,475 of the F retirement pay of the victim F, retired on March 18, 2017 within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 592,” is an employer who runs a restaurant business as a D representative in Gyeongnam-gun C, Gyeongnam-gun, and was employed from December 28, 2015, and was employed on March 17, 2017 by G’s retirement on February 1, 2017, and KRW 2,50,00,00,000, in total, of wages of KRW 1,019,360, and wages of March 1, 2017.

arrow