(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.01.29 2019나68556

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.01.29 2019나68556

손해배상금

Text

The plaintiff's claim that the court changed in exchange is dismissed.

All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On May 13, 2019, the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion entered the receiver’s address in the course of transmitting 13 “non-tecoin Capital” (hereinafter “non-tecoin Capital”) through the Defendant, who operates the Cding Exchange, by using the Defendant, the receiver’s address was erroneously entered into the receiver’s address of “non-tecoin Capital” and protocol into the electronic wall address of “non-tecoin” of different encryptions, and thus, it could not be found that the instant non-coin Capital was carried out as it is.

Although the Defendant, as a business operator mediating the remittance transaction, did not so even have prepared safety devices to prevent the protocol from being transmitted to the address of another encryption currency, and the Plaintiff’s loss of the instant non-ccoin was caused by the Defendant’s mistake. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff KRW 6,950,000, which is 13 value of “non-pcoin” at the time of the said transaction due to nonperformance of obligation or tort.

2. On May 13, 2019, the Plaintiff did not specify the specific address that the Plaintiff entered to transmit the instant non-coin Capital.

The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone does not have any evidence to acknowledge that the input address of the recipient of the instant non-coin in the instant non-coin is the electronic location of the “prop” department, and the transmission has been carried out.

Rather, the evidence Nos. 4 and 7 added to the purport of the entire pleadings, the address of the electronic wallet, for which the Plaintiff applied for the release of the instant non-coin Capital (12.9865 actually), to the Defendant on May 13, 2019, is “C” and “non-Coin” before January 14, 2018, and the instant non-tecoin was converted to “D” (the address where the instant non-tecoin Capital was omitted) which is the new address of “non-tecoin”; and the instant non-tecoin was transmitted appropriately.

It is the kind of universalism.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim that was changed in exchange in this court is justified.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2021.01.29 2019나68556

-인천지방법원 2018.11.08 2018고단1614

-제주지방법원 2018.10.31 2018고단1837

-광주지방법원 2018.06.20 2018고단293

-수원지방법원 2021.01.26 2020고단6493