logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.08 2018고단1484
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is engaged in driving a vehicle C in a third party car.

On January 21, 2018, the Defendant operated the said car on a around 22:28, and operated the said car, thereby driving it on the two-lane road in the direction of the Singu Samsung 2 in the direction of air-interest from the air room to the air-interest gate, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely operate the said car by accurately operating the steering and steering the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused occupational negligence in driving while under the influence of alcohol 0.226% in blood while driving the vehicle, which led to the front part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving direction, with the first shock of the day, and the two-lanes of the central structure, and led the victim D(36 years) driving, which was proceeding on the road facing the structure, to the end of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt fluor, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving the said vehicle over about 2 km from the first floor convenience store in Taeyang Building 1369 to the place described in paragraph (1), with the influence of alcohol content of 0.226% while under the influence of alcohol at the time of the day specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on the actual condition, a report on the detection of a primary driver (blood collection), and the result of the inspection of an active carbon;

1. On-site photographs and vehicle photographs sent to industrial specialists;

1. Videos recording Ma2 Vehicle Trackblings;

1. A certificate of damage diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Interview on duty at an infant general hospital);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of occupational and practical work).

arrow