1. The defendant shall indicate to the plaintiff the attached Form No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 1, No. 1, No. 1, No. 1,

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, on May 30, 2012, the plaintiff leased 59 square meters inside the ship (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") with each point of (a) 18,00,000, and the period from May 30, 2012 to May 30, 2014 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case") by paying the above security deposit to the plaintiff and delivered the real estate of this case from the plaintiff, and the defendant was living in the real estate of this case from around 1981 to around 1981, but it appears that the lease contract of this case was concluded with the plaintiff on May 18, 2012.

The instant lease agreement was permanently renewed at the expiration of the foregoing term, and thereafter, the Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to refuse to renew the lease agreement to the effect that no longer maintain the lease relationship on March 25, 2016, and sent the content-certified mail seeking the delivery of the instant real estate to the Defendant at around that time, and recognized the fact that it was served on the Defendant around that time.

According to the above facts, it is reasonable to view that the instant lease contract was terminated on May 30, 2016, which was the expiration date of the implied renewed contract term, and therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

The defendant asserts that since the defendant had resided in the real estate of this case while repairing and repairing electricity, water, gas, etc., he cannot deliver the real estate of this case until he is paid 20,000,000 won by the plaintiff, a lessor.

According to the evidence No. 2, "A shall be restored to its original state after the expiration of the period" as a special contract at the time of the instant lease agreement.