A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for the obstruction of performance of official duties by the Seoul Northern District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Indecent acts by compulsion;

A. On October 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed indecent act by compulsion against the victim B at the main point of “D” located on the second floor of “D” located on the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu C underground 2; (b) C, to the victim B (24 years old) seated on the side table table, attempted to attract the victim’s own losses; (c) he was informed of the victim’s her arms at the Defendant’s arms; and (d) she was aware of the victim’s her arms at the Defendant’s arms; and (e) committed indecent act against the victim by coercioning the victim’s her arms at the victim’s ear.

B. The Defendant continued to force the victim E by indecent act.

At the same time and place as described in the paragraph, the victim E(24 years of age) took the victim's hand, gets the victim free, and gets the victim "dial-a-a-the-counter", and lets the victim her free to commit an indecent act by force by inducing the victim's her free will with both arms.

2. On October 4, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 04:28, the G District District of the Incheon Southern Police Station located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, and at the time of voluntary commission due to indecent act by force as stipulated in paragraph (1), the Defendant committed an assault, such as assaulting a police officer’s bridge, who was employed in the interview room, by gathering the doctor in his/her hand, and attempting to keep the police officer out of the interview room, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each written statement E and B;

1. Photographs of the parts of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the contents of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning DNA CCTV images, DNA CCTV images, and video CDs in the G District;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the same Act concerning the crime, respectively.