The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unfasible that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of alcohol treatment order) is too unfasible.

2. In light of the content and method of each of the crimes of this case committed in the order of the judgment defendant, the following facts are deemed to be disadvantageous to the defendant: (a) the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak in light of the content and method of each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant; (b) the punishment of fines for the same kind of violence is large; and (c) the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle

On the other hand, however, the defendant recognized the facts of the crime of this case and against his mistake, the degree of injury to the victim G is relatively minor, the victim G was reported to 112 after escape, and the victim G did not want the punishment of the defendant, and the victim E deposited 6 million won to the victim E, 50,000 won, and 50,000 won to the victim H, making efforts to recover from damage, and there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the court below seems to have been detained for about 50 days, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, occupation, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records, etc. are considered to have been an opportunity for self-esteem and reflectiveness. In full view of all other circumstances that are conditions of the sentencing of this case, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.