logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2019.09.26 2019고정110
수산업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner and captain of the ship B (1.16 tons) of the fish plantation in order to operate the fishery business in order to operate the ship in order to operate the ship in order to operate the ship.

Any person who intends to run a fishery business falling under the coastal fishery business with a powered fishing vessel with a gross tonnage of less than 10 tons shall obtain permission for each fishing vessel or fishing gear from the Mayor/Do Governor.

Nevertheless, at around 06:00 on June 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) went on the bus at the seat of the Go-do, Jindo-gun, Jeonnam-do; and (b) went on the bus at the seat of the heading-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Transfer to police (report on arrest of a person who violates the Fisheries Act, etc.);

1. Certificates of shipment and certificates of designation of the use of control ship;

1. Application of documentary evidence photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant statutory provisions for criminal facts and Articles 97(1)2 and 41(2) of the Fisheries Act, the choice of a fine (including the fact that the defendant misleads and reflects the wrong recognition of the defendant, immediately discovered to the maritime police after committing the crime, and release 5 mares that have been captured therefrom, so there is no benefit for the defendant, and the defendant does not have any profit by using 30 mars that have the same criminal power, it is difficult to see that the size of the crime is small using 30 mars in the gold season, the health of the defendant is not good, and the possibility of repeating the crime is low after committing the crime, such as destroying the marbs

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow