The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From November 2018 to March 14, 2019, the Plaintiff posted a letter to jointly propose that “D”, which is a private gambling community site, “shared Dok”, “Sharing Dok” (current “Dong Dok”) participate in the joint participation of private gambling in the Internet lottery (the number from the website to 1 to 28 in the number from 5 minutes to 1 to 28 in the “general see,” and the number from 0-9 to 1 in the “short Dok” number (the number from the website to 1 to 28 in the number from 5 minutes to 1 to 0-9 in the way of publishing “spawk Dok”).

The contents related to this case among the proposals for the above bulletin shall be as follows:

The plaintiff provides a partner with even even "Saball" information, and the partner directly plays gambling in a private gambling site, etc. with his/her own money in the private gambling site, etc. using it.

Information supply fees are KRW 10 million per minute.

Members shall distribute to 5:5 the remainder after deducting the above information provision fee and the money from the amount received where the information is received after gambling using the information provided by the Plaintiff. If the information provided by the Plaintiff was based, the Plaintiff shall compensate the entire amount of the money.

B. Around February 2019, Defendant B consented to the Plaintiff’s proposal and agreed to receive even information “Saengball” from the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “Defendant B Agreement”). On March 4, 2019, Defendant B, according to the information provided by the Plaintiff, served as gambling four times in the amount of KRW 30 million.

As a result, Defendant B paid 6,4750,000 won in total to the Plaintiff as the information provided by the Plaintiff was 6,4750,000 won for the 4th installment and the 3rd installment. The last 4th installment was paid from the Plaintiff on the same day as the information provided by the Plaintiff was based on the framework of the information provided by the Plaintiff.

C. Defendant C consented to the Plaintiff’s proposal on April 2019, and the Plaintiff’s “Sengball” information is even known from the Plaintiff.