Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above provisions are applicable to the defendants for two years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were willing to lend money from victims E in terms of legal costs and to invest in the redevelopment project of the F apartment with the money.

Defendant

A From July 2010, 2010, Sicker Eul stated that “A shall receive 3 billion won from a person who is currently G, while G shall have a foreign company, and there shall be several hundred million won in the foreign exchange bank. At present, B shall seize G’s bank account to G and be in the process of G and shall pay in return for money if he/she won in the lawsuit.” From time to time, “the cost of attorney shall be required to withdraw money from the foreign exchange bank because he/she won in the lawsuit.” “The cost of attorney-at-law to be paid to the former attorney-at-law shall be sent to H under the name of the head of office, who is an attorney-at-law, because the head of H does not resolve the day, and so, he/she shall send the cost of attorney-at-law to the victim under the name of the head of office, who is an attorney-at-law, and shall request the defendant to send the cost of attorney-at-law to the victim under the name of the head of the Tong to 000, and make the defendant 300800.”.

However, in fact, Defendant B did not have seized G’s bank account, and the lawsuit filed against G was not in progress in the judgment of winning the lawsuit, H was only an apartment executor, was not the head of the bar office, and there was no change in the attorney-at-law in the course of the lawsuit with G.

In addition, the Defendants did not use the money borrowed from the victims as the above legal costs and invested the money in the redevelopment project of the F apartment.