Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2019, the Defendant, at around 22:09, 16 years old, was able to use the upper part of the victim’s right side side gate, which was moved to the calculation in order to calculate the Defendant’s meal expenses from his high flag, on two occasions by hand, with the hands hand, etc., in which the victim B (n, 16 years old) worked as an employee. On two occasions before 19, the Defendant was able to use the upper part of the victim’s right side gate in the front of 199.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and D;

1. Investigation report (to have telephone conversations for witnesses);

1. Application of CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to crimes;

1. Relevant Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 6 of the Discretionary Mitigation and Mitigation Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances shall be considered among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Orders to disclose, notify, and exempt from employment restrictions orders;

(a) The proviso to Article 49 (1) or the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

(b) The proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (a special circumstance under which the disclosure and notification of personal information, the restriction on employment should not be ordered, in full view of the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, and social ties, criminal records, criminal records, the risk of recidivism, the type, motive, process, disclosure and notification of the instant crime, the degree and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the employment restriction order, the prevention of sex crimes subject to registration that may be achieved due to such order

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order; and

1. Legal provisions;