The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. A person who has committed an indecent act against the defendant while he is well-grounded in the grounds of appeal;

The contents of the statement made by the victim are specific and consistent, and the contents of the statement made by the defendant were reflected as the victim.

In full view of the fact that it is inconsistent with E’s statement and that it is confirmed that the Defendant had stayed in the victim for a long time, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed an indecent act like the facts charged.

Nevertheless, since the court below acquitted the charged facts of this case, the court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) the Defendant stayed in a room where the victim and E were accommodated from June 25, 2014 to June 03:25, 2014; (b) the Defendant’s content differs from the content of E’s statement; and (c) the Defendant dialogueed while the victim was able to stay in a room where the victim was accommodated for a long time.

Although there are doubtful circumstances, such as the fact that the assertion does not easily understand, it is proven that the facts charged in the instant case are beyond reasonable doubt in light of the following circumstances:

It is difficult to see

The decision was determined.

1) The Defendant and the victim’s time zone are as follows.

02:32:11 - The defendant - The defendant - - the defendant - the cherb between F (working) and 303, and 02:32:51 - the defendant - the defendant - the cherb between 303 to 302 and 302, coming from 02:34:08 - the defendant - the defendant 301 heading 03:07:16 - the victim 301 heading 301 and 302 heading 03:09:15 - the defendant 301 heading from 301 to 302 heading from 301 to 301 heading from 303:0 to 301 heading from 03:50 the defendant's hand, which appears to be the defendant's hand, and the defendant - the defendant - the defendant 's handbalk's hand - 305:3102.