beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution and one million won of fine at the Daegu District Court on July 201, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 26, 2018.
[2] On August 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the office of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station B located in the 249 Seo-gu Police Station B located in the 249, with the compensation for the State bond of the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu on August 31, 2017; and (b) was working on criminal duty, and (c) was able to obtain information from the Defendant.
“The head of the team” refers to “The head of the team asked to work in around 09:00 so far,” and the head of the team respondeded to “A’s attitude in the waiting room for civil petitioners by not later than that time,” and the head of the team blicked the c’s attitude, and blicked the front hand, and assaulted the part of the above C at one time, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning police officer’s criminal duty.
On July 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution and one million won of fine at the Daegu District Court on July 26, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 26, 2018.
[2] On November 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 12:00 on November 2, 2017, at a F cafeteria operated by the victim E (V, 50 years of age) in Daegu-gu, the Defendant expressed a desire to other customers without any particular reason under the influence of alcohol; (b) and (c) make a bath call with mobile phones; and (d) reported a disturbance to the police from the person who suffered damage.
The tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base.
C. H. H. H. H. M. H. H. H. H. H., by force, interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about one hour and 40 minutes.
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 2940"
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. Statement made by the police against C;
1. CCTV images to be cut;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Three copies, including a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (final and conclusive judgment), and text of judgment “2017 order 3032”;
1. The defendant's person;