logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단2352
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no one shall borrow or lend any access medium, or keep, deliver or distribute such medium, while giving, receiving, demanding or promising any access medium in electronic financial transactions or using or managing any access medium to secure the authenticity and accuracy of the users and the details of such transaction.

Nevertheless, on March 2016, the defendant would pay 1.6 million won to the person who was deceased and wounded in the middle of the 2016.

“On the proposal of “,” and with the consent of the Defendant’s dwelling at Suwon-si B, 616, one of the physical card linked to one bank C account opened in the name of the Defendant, and the USB with the official certificate and password connected to the account, sent to the Nonindicted Party via Kwikset Service Articles.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on verification of transaction details, reply details, such as the National Bank, etc.;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 of the relevant Act and Article 49 (3) 1 and 10 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 6 (3) 2 and 6 (3) 1 and 10 of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. While predicting the possibility of being used in illegal transactions for pecuniary interests, the Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, committed the instant crime, thereby disrupting the financial transaction order.

The access media was actually used for fraud crime, and the third victim was blicked.

However, prior to the instant case, the Defendant did not have any record of crimes other than the criminal records of a fine for the crime of Lee Jong-chul.

The Defendant is against the instant crime.

The age, age, and age of the defendant.

arrow