1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of August 15, 1912, F acquired the G-do G-do G-do at the time of 15, 1912 (hereinafter “instant G-do”). B. The Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of transfer of ownership under the name of Defendant Republic of Korea as the receipt of the Daegu District Court’s receipt No. 676 on February 4, 1969, pursuant to the Act on Special Measures for the Adjustment of Farmland Reform Project under F’s name, the registration of subrogated preservation was completed under the name of the same registry office as the receipt of the same date. (c) On February 5, 1969, the said land is the land of the Gyeongbuk-do-do river H1,610 square meters in the name of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “H land before the instant division”).

I was divided into KRW 159 (hereinafter “I land before the instant subdivision”). D.

As to H land before the division of this case, the Daegu District Court Doldong Office received on November 23, 1990 from No. 20704, Nov. 6, 1990, and the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant Gyeongbuk-do was completed on August 13, 1990, No. 15481, Aug. 13, 1990, as to the land of this case prior to the division of this case.

E. On March 26, 2019, H land before the instant subdivision was divided into 1,3 land listed in the separate sheet, and the I land before the instant subdivision was divided into 2,4 land listed in the separate sheet.

(F) The F had already died at the time of registration of the name. (F) The name was registered.

The property of the deceased F was inherited to the family heir, and the property of the deceased J was transferred to K due to the death of the J, and the property of the deceased K was transferred to L and the plaintiff due to the death of K, to the plaintiff, the deceased L's property was inherited to the plaintiff B and M.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 16 and Eul evidence 1 (including all of the paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the above registration of ownership preservation made in the name of F, which was already deceased, is null and void.