logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.01.20 2020가합10605
부당이득금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

[Reasons for Recognition: The defendant is a company that newly constructed and sold an aggregate building (hereinafter "building of this case"), which is located in F at the time of harmony, and the plaintiffs are several parties. The defendant is a company that newly built and sold an aggregate building (hereinafter "building of this case"), which is located in F.

On October 20, 2017, the Defendant entered into an agreement with H and the third floor of the instant building (I through J) and the fourth floor (K through L) with “M Council members,” and concluded a lease contract with the whole five floors (G through P) of the instant building and part ( Q through R) of the six floors “N and the instant building for the purpose of use,” and entered into an agreement with H and the rehabilitation hospital and the hospitalization room for the lease with the purpose of use; thereafter, H succeeded to N’s rights and obligations (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”). On November 24, 2017, Plaintiff A and B agreed to sell the leased object to 30, 30, 464, 47, 47, 30, 47, 47, 47, 47, 57, 47, 47, 57, 57, 30, 57, 47, 57, 57, 47, 57, 10.

On December 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) concluded a consulting agreement with H, ② V (a person who engaged in the business of operating H department hospital), ③ W (a person engaged in the business of consulting the opening of a hospital); and (b) the Defendant agreed to subsidize expenses of KRW 2 billion for the opening of a hospital in the hospital room of the instant hospital (hereinafter “the instant consulting agreement”); (c) H established a X hospital with nine specialized departments, including internal medicine, at the clinic of the instant hospital on August 7, 2018.

arrow