A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 11, 2013, around 22:47, the Defendant opened a copy of “a notice on the composition of executive officers of the 19th council of occupants’ representatives,” where it is impossible to identify the market price, which is owned by the council of occupants’ representatives, posted at five entrances, on the grounds that the occupants and their family members want to know that he/she was deprived of the election of the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, at the bulletin board of the entrance of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City

2. On April 12, 2013, at around 22:31, the Defendant opened a copy of “a letter of approval for installation of outdoor fitness equipment in a complex and a letter of request for re-packaged construction of road asphalt” on the ground that the notice posted at a bulletin board of the first floor, the first floor, and the above apartment elevator inside the above apartment elevator did not go through the council of occupants’ representatives, respectively, and damaged it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness witness D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant's act of collecting the documents posted without the consent of the management company is a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules and is thus dismissed.

In light of the circumstances indicated in the records of this case, the method and result of the act of removing the documents of this case at will by the defendant in light of all circumstances such as the defendant's intention, etc., the above assertion is not acceptable.