Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2015, the Defendant driven a car at the B motherhouse on December 13, 2015, and proceeded to a about 50 km speed from the 5-lane of the entrance road of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 43-ro 24-ro, which is the 5-lane of the entrance road of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

There are signs for temporary suspension of vehicles on the right side of the driving direction, and in the front side of the crosswalks are installed, the driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to stop the vehicle in accordance with the safety signs as well as to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the instructions and prevent the accident by driving the vehicle in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not temporarily stop according to the temporary parking sign, and did not stop the bicycle driving on the right side of the victim C(72 years of age) driving a bicycle on the right side from the left side of the running direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as an injury of an anti-cerebral brain, focusing on the fact that there is no one in two open for about 13 weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Polygyp test reports and comprehensive traffic accident analysis reports;

1. Medical certificates and medical statements;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense.

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending punishment] general traffic accidents in the category 1 (the injury of traffic accidents) and the special mitigation area: The defendant's crime of this case is subject to criticism in that he is not subject to punishment [the decision of sentencing], the defendant violated the suspension signal, and the victim's injury.