logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.08.12 2014고합527 (1)
뇌물수수등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by a fine of eight thousand won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was appointed as the president of the G Cooperatives on March 21, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “G Cooperatives”) and was reappointed on March 19, 2010, and worked as the president of the Association on June 2015 before the end of his/her retirement, and was in general in charge of all the affairs of the Association, such as union members and credit business, while working as the president of the Association. H is a person working as the staff of the G Cooperatives from March 1995 to December 201, and I is a person operating a company of J as a member of the G Cooperatives.

1. Acceptance of bribe against Defendant A

A. On November 201, 2010, the Defendant received cash KRW 500,000 from H on the pretext of a solicitation to transfer from H to KK’s office in front of the Defendant’s residence in Gangseo-gu Seoul, and received a bribe in connection with his/her duties.

B. On December 201, 201, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to his/her duties, on the pretext of a solicitation that he/she would employ children from I as KK contract workers in a taxi located on the street in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul. The Defendant received KRW 3 million of the gift certificate department store and received a bribe in relation to his/her duties.

2. On March 2013, Defendant A’s alteration of private documents and alteration of the document event was called by the Board of Audit and Inspection to conduct an audit in relation to the voluntary increase of loan interest rates at K, and Defendant A’s alteration of the document was able to affix a rubber seal with the content that customers agreed on the loan transaction agreement of the existing loan customers so as not to detect any arbitrary manipulation of loan interest rates.

On March 2013, the Defendant instructed the head of GV headquarters located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to affix rubber seals to the existing loan customers in preparation for a gold-time audit, and the head of the branch office in receipt of the above order instructed the employees under his jurisdiction to affix rubber seals in the loan transaction agreement as above.

The employees belonging to the Gu head office in receipt of the above instruction shall be M in the name of M, which was kept in custody by the G head office around that time.

arrow