beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the decision on retrial;
A. The parties’ status intervenors are corporations running urban bus transportation business using approximately 220 full-time workers, and the Plaintiff is a person employed by the Intervenor on July 11, 2005 and serving as an urban bus driver.
B. On October 5, 2015, at around 09:13, the Plaintiff changed the bus line from the front three lanes to the first lane while operating a bus in the direction of a smooth passenger stop, and at around 9:0,000 won (the Intervenor’s bus 100,000 won, and 800,000 won for the said car) due to the collision of passenger cars in the first lane, the Plaintiff started operating the bus in the front passenger stop in the front passenger stop in the front passenger zone and caused 9:0,000 won (the Intervenor’s bus 10,000 won, and 8:00,000 won). (2) On January 8, 2016, the Plaintiff started operating the bus in the front passenger stop in the front passenger stop in the front passenger stop in the front passenger stop and caused the injury of the front passenger while getting off the bus more than 12 weeks. As a result, the Plaintiff incurred treatment expenses of KRW 4925,270,00.
3) On November 2, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) stopped at a bus stop located in the bit eculified Station while driving a bus in the direction of the commercial name belt on November 2, 2016; (b) and (c) caused 69,300 won repair costs by collisioning the front of the bus that was behind the brac operating failure. (d) The Intervenor held the Disciplinary Committee on December 27, 2016, held the Plaintiff on the ground of the traffic accident described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of the above Article, and was subject to a disciplinary measure for 20 days of suspension on service on board by recognizing the traffic accident as the grounds for the disciplinary action.
(5) On January 4, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for reexamination of the instant disciplinary action against the Intervenor. However, the Intervenor’s reexamination disciplinary committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff’s application for reexamination on January 20, 2017. 6) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of suspension of service on board (five days, two days, ten days, and one day) four times from October 4, 2006, after joining the Intervenor, until September 6, 2013, which was the date of the instant disciplinary action.
b) the Commission;