logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.12 2013가단58230
용역대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(b)any serious damage to a ship and any other incident shall be liable to the defendant.

(B) The plaintiff (B) shall enter into a locking operation team of the vessel on the water surface of the sunken vessel, which is necessary to keep the vessel on the water surface.

6. The Plaintiff is going to work in preparation for restoration work in a moving state while the sunken vessel is out of the water surface (10 m-20m in the depth of the water).

7. The sinking line shall be restored on the surface of the water and the cycle of the plaintiff's work until the sinking line starts from the Incheon Port.

15. The Plaintiff shall prepare all equipment and materials before the sinking vessel is restored.

(Provided, That the materials necessary for restoration are purchased by the Defendant and the Plaintiff are connected to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff is at the intervals of being connected to water supply, and there is no responsibility for the contact with the Plaintiff). The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 5,00,000 as an audit honorarium upon completion of the work of the Plaintiff (B).

* Restoration means the condition that a sunken vessel is placed on the water surface under normal conditions, following the sunken vessel leaving the water surface.

On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff started support work and attempted to provide support to the instant vessel sunken under the former condition by inserting back the air, and the same year.

6.3. Around around 3.0, the player part of the instant vessel was above the surface of the sea level of three to four meters.

However, the ship of this case had a number of spawns, and the fisher, the plaintiff, and the plaintiff demanded the defendant to prevent the spawn from spreading.

The defendant did not comply with this and requested the plaintiff to continue to injecting.

When the Defendant continues to injecting fish, it may pose a risk of collision with the vessel of 3rd and the vessel of this case may take many expenses. The Plaintiff and the Defendant ceased to injecting the vessel, and the vessel of this case came to sit down under the surface of the sea.

E. Thereafter, June 2013

arrow