1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is the Culture and Arts Foundation established on February 26, 2009 for the promotion of culture and arts in accordance with the ordinance of the C local government, and the plaintiff was appointed as the representative director of the defendant on July 3, 2017.

(B) The corporate registration injury has taken office as a director.

On August 21, 2017, at the Plaintiff’s office, the Plaintiff stated that D’s employee D wanted to show the Defendant’s business ability in relation to the employment of Class 5 government bonds in the course of performing his duties, that D said D said D’s employee D said D’s “to dance in Korea”, “to be well fluent, well fluent,” “nickly fluent,” “nickly fluent,” “nickly fluent,” and “ice fluent, good.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant remarks”) C.

D A. On November 10, 2017, the Ministry of Labor and Labor declared that the Plaintiff was sexual harassment from the Plaintiff to the Gyeyang-gu Regional Employment and Labor Agency. On January 31, 2018, the Ministry of Labor and Labor sent an official message to the Defendant on the violation of the Labor Relations Act, stating that “Inasmuch as it was confirmed that the Plaintiff caused a sense of shame to workers through sexual words and actions, as a result of the investigation of a petition case, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff caused a sense of shame by sexual words and actions, such as disciplinary action, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Equal Employment Opportunity and Work-Family Balance Assistance Act” to the Defendant.

On February 21, 2018, the Defendant held a board of directors (hereinafter “Board of Directors of this case”) on February 21, 2018, made a resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff from the Defendant’s representative director on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the Labor Relations Act by sexual harassment against D (hereinafter “instant resolution of dismissal”), and notified the Plaintiff of the result of the instant dismissal resolution.

[Ground of recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 5, 17, 18, 34, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The resolution of dismissal of this case is null and void, as the primary claim of this case contains the following defects.

(1) The Defendant of this case’s procedural defect