A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18:56, 2014, the Defendant driven a CMP7 car and driven the road in front of the Gu in the direction of the Seoul metropolitan zone during the Ansan-gu period, the Defendant, on the ground that the FNte car driven by the injured party E (the age of 39) was driven by the Gap himself, was driven by the car in front of the above CM7 car, followed the car in front of the above CM7 car, followed the car in a sudden operation in front of the above CM7 car, thereby causing the victim to suffer about two weeks of the lower part of the above CM7 car, and at the same time damaged the car in front of the above CM7 car owned by the injured party, the repair cost was 2,251,027 won.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and suffered injury to the victim, and at the same time damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate of repair costs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to cut booms video images;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes; Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of inflicting bodily injury on a dangerous object); Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of causing bodily injury on a dangerous object);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not timely and that the victim inflicted bodily injury on the victim using a motor vehicle is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, there is a relatively minor agreement with the victim, and there is a relatively minor injury, it seems that the defendant committed an intentional bodily injury, there is no criminal conviction above the suspension of execution, and the detention of the defendant seems to entail excessive difficulty to the family members.

Taking account of these circumstances, the text is as follows.