logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.04.29 2019고단1424
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sales company of commercial cargo vehicles with the trade name of “B,” and the victim C is a person who engages in cargo transportation brokerage business with the trade name of “E” in Kimcheon-si D.

1. On June 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) forged a private document; (b) forged a private document; (c) forged a private document; and (d) forged a certificate of vehicle transfer, which received a request from the victim to seek the number plate of a truck for business use from the victim at the above “E” office on June 3, 2019; and (c) attempted to obtain the purchase price of the number plate from the victim as if the victim had the right to purchase and sell the number plate.

On June 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) written a car transfer certificate using a tampial, and written it in the transferor’s column “F G, resident number H, Gyeongbuk-gun I”; and (b) written the content column “J,00986, Echeon, Echeon, Korean commercial name 10, 4.5t; (c) paid the down payment, cash payment of the down payment; (d) June 10, 2019; and (d) written the transferor’s stamp “F” and marked the transferor’s seal.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a motor vehicle transfer certificate in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant: (a) stated the date and time indicated in the foregoing paragraph; and (b) stated that “The Defendant would purchase the J number plate of a truck for business use to 24 million won; and (c) would transfer the number plate to June 10, 2019.”

However, the Defendant did not have any authority to purchase the F-owned J number plates, and it was thought that the Defendant would receive the number plates from the victim to use them for personal purposes. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to purchase the business number plates.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is 4 million won on the same day as the purchase price for the number plate from the victim.

arrow