1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Plaintiff A is the friendship of Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff B was living together with the Defendant’s children from October 2005, and was raising a marriage on June 17, 2006 and maintaining a de facto marriage relationship until July 26, 2007.

B. On December 9, 2011, the appellate court (Seoul High Court 201Reu2463) filed by the Plaintiff B against the Defendant and D and the appellate court of property division case, the Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff A from the corridor of the preparatory procedure room (Seoul High Court 201Reu2463) in Seoul High Court 658 on December 9, 201, 15:0, when the Plaintiff her drinking the Plaintiff, and caused the Plaintiff’s injury, such as dump, telegraph, etc.

C. In addition, around November 7, 2005, the Defendant: (a) detained the Plaintiff B in the Defendant’s residence; (b) laid the front of the Plaintiff B in November 2006; and (c) inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff B, such as breaking the front of the Plaintiff B, resulting in a fluence on the basin.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the plaintiffs due to illegal acts such as confinement and assault against the plaintiffs.

2. The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant detained or abused the plaintiffs as alleged by the plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiffs' claims are without merit, and all of them are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.