1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revoked part is revoked.

Basic Facts

The relevant defendant of the parties is a juristic person operating Daejeon Emba Hospital in Daejeon-ro 64 (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Hospital"), while the plaintiff (D) was hospitalized in the defendant hospital and was hospitalized in the defendant hospital on June 20, 2012, and suffered damage to the right-hand peter, including renal renal flaging and salvatory salving surgery on June 20, 2012.

In February 2012, the Plaintiff complained of the pain of the Defendant Hospital’s internal history and the instant surgery to the right side (hereinafter referred to as “the part of the symptoms symptoms and the part of the surgery constitutes the right side of the Defendant Hospital, and omitted) after he was in the middle of the mountain, etc., and the symptoms were generated at the individual hospital, but the symptoms were not shown. However, on May 31, 2012, the Plaintiff was inside the Defendant hospital’s hospital’s medical team. At the time of the internalization, the Plaintiff complained of the shoulder’s pain that “the medical team of the Defendant hospital led to the ethic to the ethic fever after the ethic wave in the individual hospital,” and the medical team of the hospital took the ethic test and the ethic test against the Plaintiff.

On June 14, 2012, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant Hospital to the effect that the Plaintiff was not lying on the open side. Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on June 19, 2012, when considering the Plaintiff’s serious opinion on the field of the revolving part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part and the collision supporting part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the 2012.

On June 20, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the instant surgery (hereinafter referred to as “instant surgery”) with respect to the Plaintiff using a rthroscope under the general anesthesia.

The Defendant hospital medical personnel in the past from the instant surgery to the discharge shall manage the Plaintiff’s department of operation after the instant surgery, and assess the quantity and degree of pains.