beta
Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
Of the size of 1330.6 square meters in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the attached drawings 2, 3, 3.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 8, 1963, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was owned by the Defendant, was incorporated into the H land readjustment project district of the 6th group of G forest of the 4th group (1,380 square meters, hereinafter “the instant forest”). On August 8, 1963, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, which was owned by the Defendant, divided the instant forest into the land of 36 pieces (hereinafter “divided forest”). (2) The Defendant received an application for purchase of state property from 1964 to 1966 from the possessor who owned the relevant forest and owned the house, and sold the forest to the occupant of the relevant land after the division corresponding to the portion he occupied.
3) Upon completion of the said land readjustment project on October 5, 1967, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City “142 square meters [142 square meters in total, 1,380 square meters in total, and 5 lots of land adjacent thereto] [1,42 square meters in K site:
[2] As to “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu P, Q, R through S, T through U, V, W, X, Y through Z,” “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu P, Q, R through M, X, Y through Z,” and “co-owned land after land substitution” (a total of 2,066.1m2, a total of the area;
(A) A replotting disposition was taken as a land substitution final land. At this time, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu AA forest land 57 square meters (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s land before replotting”) among the forests and fields after the division is “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu AB land” (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s land before replotting”) is the same location as that of the Plaintiff’s land before replotting on the ship (A) located in the sequence of (2), 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 100 square meters (attached Form No. 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 11,
[4] The name-free person, who owned and resided on the Plaintiff’s land before replotting, entered into a sales contract for state property to purchase the Plaintiff’s land before replotting with the Defendant, and paid the price in full to the Defendant.
However, the subdivision registration on the forest of this case has not yet been completed.