A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 4, 2015, the Defendant made an investment in capital of 100 million won in the victim C’s house located in the Chinese name, and the Defendant is fine for an earning rate.

As a temporary shortage of funds, if 30 million won is invested, 30 million won of each month's revenue will be paid within the maximum of 9 million won, since at least 30 million won of each month's revenue will be paid in one month.

Since a person holds money in cash or in writing, he/she does not lose his/her principal, and if he/she is required to pay money, he/she will return the principal at any time.

“I” means “I” and thereafter called “I” to the next victim.

B. The first sending 5 million won of the investment fund as the purchase price is insufficient, and the amount is not sufficient.

(E) On January 15, 2015, “E” received KRW 5 million from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant on January 7, 2015, and agreed on January 15, 2015 to divide the amount of KRW 30 million from the injured party who received an investment of KRW 30,000 from the injured party and received an investment of KRW 30,000,000 from the injured party to the said account as the remaining investment amount, and received money from the injured party on the same day as the remaining investment amount.

However, in fact, there was no certain income or special property and there was no investment of KRW 100 million in relation to the money exchange business above, and around that time, the Defendant was unable to pay profits even after receiving investment from F outside of the indictment, and even if he was made an investment from the damaged party due to economic difficulties, such as having a debt burden on G outside the indictment for pro-Japanese, even if he was made an investment from the victimized party, he did not have the intent or ability to return the principal promised to the injured party or divide the profits.

After all, the Defendant, as mentioned above, obtained a sum of KRW 30,000 from the damaged person as investment money and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant is on the date of the second public trial;