A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on May 3, 2006 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and the judgment is the same year.

8. A final and conclusive judgment of December 24, 2008, which was paroled on December 24, 2008 during the execution of the sentence, and the period of parole expired on January 18, 2009. On October 22, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and three years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 30, 2010 and is still under suspended execution.

[2011 Highest 9632] On January 17, 2011, the Defendant entered into an agreement on stock transfer and acquisition, which the Defendant would take over KRW 350 million of the F, a cover of 300 million of the share of the victim E, at the Djoint Law Office located in Busan, Busan, and entered into a contract with the Defendant to take over KRW 300 million of the share of F, a cover of 350 million.

After that, on February 18, 201, the Defendant issued to the victim two promissory notes (bill number G, H) issued to the victim of a foreign bank with a face value of KRW 50 million for the payment of the down payment of KRW 100 million out of the said share transfer price, and delivered two copies of the check number per foreign exchange bank with a face value of KRW 50 million for the second part payment of KRW 100 million for the second part payment, and then issued two copies ( check number I, J) of the check number per foreign exchange bank with a face value of KRW 50 million for the payment of KRW 10 million for the second part payment.

However, the above promissory note and the check per unit belong to a financial institution through the most recent sales rather than the actual transaction performance, and they were a note and check which cannot be approved normally on the payment date due to a 'bbbbbing note' or a 'banding check' issued by concluding a contract for current account transaction. Moreover, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount equivalent to the face value on the payment date of the said note and the check because there was no other economic income sources, such as there

Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it.