1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. On February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff, as the representative of the occupant, entered into a contract for defect repair works (hereinafter “instant contract”). On July 8, 2014, the Plaintiff paid all the construction cost on the following: (a) the Plaintiff, as the representative of the occupant, entered into the instant contract with the Defendant for the “CBD” (hereinafter “CBD”); (b) and (c) the cost of the instant construction works on the following grounds: (d) the cost of the instant contract was not adequate for the waterproof construction works under 502; (b) it is difficult to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s demand for the payment of KRW 13,965,00 in total, KRW 13,900,000, and delay damages for the said construction; (b) the Defendant stated the issue of the instant contract; (c) whether the instant 502 No. 502 was included in the instant contract; and (d) there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s demand for repair works on the basis of the estimate submitted to the Plaintiff’s separate construction works.