The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 7, 2015, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, around 21:00, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim for the following reasons: (a) “Influencies,” on the ground that the victim D had access to the “Librid game” in the Pabrid room in Seoul Pacs., and had access to the “Librid game” together with five game reservoirs, and distributed it to the victim for the purpose of paying for the trial expenses. (b) Ni-U.S.A. * * Madar * Madar Madar * Madar Madar Madar * Madar Madar Madar Madar * * Madar Madar Madar Madar - Madar Madar Madar Madar?”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. Revocation of complaint: The withdrawal of complaint filed on June 1, 2015, which was subsequent to the institution of this case;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.