logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.08.22 2014가합4125
퇴거등
Text

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 22,726,170 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from October 26, 2012 to August 22, 2014.

Reasons

(b) transfer, including all facilities, to the extent possible;

§ 3. Charges such as the reversion of proceeds and taxes and public charges, etc. from the above movables (all parts and facilities, business rights), and immovable property shall belong to the transferor and to the transferee for any subsequent property before that date as of the date of delivery of the above immovables, respectively.

Where the period of a lease contract expires, the seller shall refund the rental deposit to the purchaser.

Article 6 The seller is unable to change the name due to the prop-owned circumstances, but when the circumstances so permit, he shall immediately implement the change of name, and transfer the right of lease of real estate to the seller.

Article 8 All all expenses and taxes and public charges incurred in the operation of the factory shall be borne by the lessee, and if the lessee fails to pay, the deposit shall be deducted

Matters of special agreement* in all articles related to telephone number, facsimile and telecommunications for business activities* in all articles existing in a store * in whole for business use * in building, signboard and structure related to business * in full for store lease * in full for store maintenance and management * in full for external trade as before, and in compensation for, the buyer shall pay KRW 3,000,000 per month.

3. On October 15, 2012, the Defendant operated the industrial company of this case after the lease term with the owner, and on February 24, 2011, between G and G, the Defendant provided the industrial company of this case to G, and entered into a business participation agreement with G to operate the industrial company of this case at its own expense and responsibility, and thereafter, G operated the industrial company of this case from that time.

However, as the management has deteriorated, the Defendant concluded a business participation contract with H on February 2012 with the foregoing contents and operated the industrial company of this case since H around that time.

The Plaintiff worked in the industrial company of this case for the same period, while performing management and business.

On the other hand, the defendant raised objection.

arrow