logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.07.03 2019고단758
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving B car volume.

On January 22, 2019, at around 19:10, the Defendant proceeded bypassing to the scarg distance of scarg trees in the middle of the three-lane road in the direction from D to E-market intersection.

Since a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, if a pedestrian passes the crosswalk, the driver has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not avoid the victim G (at 25 years of age) who walked in the direction of F apartment in the green signal E, and shocked into the front right part of the Defendant's driving vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury, such as mination and mination of the left-hand 14 weeks of treatment by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A G statement (a statement of traffic accident situation);

1. A traffic accident report, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the register of car driving licenses and car driving licenses;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case committed under the unfavorable circumstances for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is due to the defendant's act of causing injury to the victim under the age of 25, by shocking the victim who walked on the crosswalk according to the pedestrian green signal, such as the cost-frame mination of the left-hand part of the victim who is in need of treatment for about 14 weeks. Thus, the defendant's breach of the duty of care is serious and the damage to the victim is serious.

arrow