Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. Determination

A. The crime of this case in part of the defendant was committed by the defendant and the person who requested to attach an attachment order (hereinafter "the defendant") committed an act of killing the victim's knife with the victim's knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife with his knife.

In addition, there is no particular change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the original judgment, and the sentencing of the original court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, even if it is considered that the Defendant was unable to do so, and rather contingently, the circumstances leading to the instant crime and his mistake are divided and reflected.