(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.07.22 2014고정312

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.07.22 2014고정312

공무집행방해

Text

A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a worker in daily employment.

On January 29, 2014, at around 03:20, the Defendant reported the 112-report at the “C main point in Gumi-si B”.

The defendant, after receiving a report from the Gu police station D Zone D to the Gu police station, completed the duty of report processing for about 1 hours and 20 minutes and completed the duty of handling a report, and called that he will put his hand into the window of the patrol vehicle and forced him to open the door, prevent the door from being closed, and make a statement by accompanying to the district.

The Defendant: (a) during the course of getting along and departing from the patrol vehicle to the earth, he she was fested with the same son; (b) he she was fested to the police of the Republic of Korea; (c) she was fested to the police of the Republic of Korea; (d) the police at all times she was able to take an accident and be fright to the main fright; and (e) the police continued to take the fright to go out of the said zone, who was requested to go home to go off from the said zone by drinking and repeatedly going to go out of the said zone; (d) she was allowed to go out of the said zone; (e) opened a back door of the investigative interview room in the earth where only she is allowed to have access to the zone; and (e) she was allowed to go out of the said E face; and (e) she was faced with the entrance of the said E; and (e) she got off the door by cutting off the door, and cut off the said E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender and a criminal investigation report (personal details, etc. of a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.05.23 2019고단73

-울산지방법원 2016.04.08 2015고정1163

-청주지방법원 2017.05.17 2016고단1709

-부산지방법원 2016.05.18 2016고단204

-춘천지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단825