1. The Defendant received KRW 54,000,000 from the Plaintiff at the same time, and simultaneously received the payment from the Plaintiff:

(a) real estate listed in the separate sheet;

1. Basic facts

A. Gwangju Northern-gu C and D ground E consisting of Adong and B, and two columns of the first floor 6, 7 Lins under B consent were destroyed on July 24, 2014 (hereinafter “instant safety accident”).

As a result, both A and B were found to have problems such as “explosive exposure to steel bars, corrosion, concrete stuffing, rupture of the outer wall of underground floors, and that the entire building is on the hallway side,” and “the safety of the facility is dangerous due to serious defects in the safety grade E, that is, the use of the facility should be prohibited, and reinforcement or reconstruction should be conducted,” and the resident evacuation order was issued to B.

B. After the safety accident in the instant case, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of a housing redevelopment and consolidation project association from the head of Gwangju North-gu Office on May 16, 2017 under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents for the purpose of housing reconstruction improvement project in the area of 6,873 square meters in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, North-gu, Gwangju, and completed the establishment registration on May 25, 201, and the Defendant is the owner of the real estate listed in the attached

C. On June 14, 2017, the Plaintiff asked the Defendant whether or not the Plaintiff consented to the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association, and on the other hand, the Plaintiff becomes a person subject to a claim for sale where he/she does not consent to the establishment of the association within two months from the date of receipt of the official document, and the Plaintiff sent an official document to the effect that he/she would exercise the right to demand sale pursuant to Article 39 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Act

E. On September 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and stated in the complaint that he/she shall exercise the right to demand sale under Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act, and the duplicate of the complaint on November 2, 2017.