Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Although there is a fact that the victim of a misunderstanding of fact excludes the number of the victim's right hand in the drafting of the defendant, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the defendant was not aware that he removed the victim's left hand hand, and cut off the victim's surface.
B. The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal
A. According to the reasoning of the lower court’s judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts, and evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, it is sufficiently recognized that: (a) around January 2, 2017, the Defendant 16:30, at the D performance hall located on the first floor of the building of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, put the victim’s left hand in his own drafting, putting the victim’s left hand hand over; and (b) putting the victim’s left hand hand on the part of the victim; and (c) putting the victim’s left hand on the part of the victim’s back, cut the first mad completely, thereby completely cutting the victim’s 5 water area in need of treatment for about 6 weeks.
In addition, the defendant's assertion that the victim's loss is the number in light of the victim's appearance of left hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, treatment details received by the victim, etc., which is cut by each image of the victim's hand hand hand hand taken up before the operation, after the operation, and the victim's hand hand hand hand hand hand.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.
B. Examining the following circumstances: (a) there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and (b) the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the record and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court.