logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.12.22 2016고단269
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against each of the assaults is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 7, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Cheongju District Court Support on December 15, 2009. On July 3, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Cheongju District Court Support on December 15, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Although the Defendant was punished for the violation of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, on June 26, 2016, the Defendant driven an EM7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.078% from the 1km section to the day before a restaurant located in the same city C in the same city from the Do in the Dobong-si, Seocheon-si to the day before a restaurant located in the same city.

2. On June 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 16:05, around D 16:05, the Defendant used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully by denying the use of another person’s resident registration number by: (b) the Defendant demanded the presentation of a driver’s license and a resident registration certificate from the head of the police station of the Gyeongcheon Police Station, which was in charge of the crackdown on drinking; and (c) the Defendant’s h’s resident registration number (I) while carrying the Defendant’s friendly arrest as the Defendant’s Ha

3. The Defendant forged private document; the date and time specified in paragraph (2); the place specified in paragraph (2); written “H” in the driver’s name column of the “report on the Statement of Principal Drivers; and signed nextly; the Defendant entered “H” and “I” in the name column of the suspended person; the Defendant made the police enter the name column of the blood collector’s consent and written request for blood gathering in the “H”; and issued the said documents as if they were duly established.

This is the defendant.

arrow