1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The testimony of the witness E shall be changed to “each testimony of the witness E and the witness G of the first instance trial” on the 3th page of the judgment of the first instance.

The following shall be added to the fourth 18th tier judgment:

According to the testimony of the witness G at the trial, G stated to the effect that “G may not pay more than KRW 20,000,000 instead of reducing the purchase price of KRW 50,000,00,” and that “the remainder of the brokerage commission is divided into two parts.” Thus, even according to the above testimony, it is not acknowledged that there was an agreement between the Defendants and the Plaintiff to pay the brokerage commission on behalf of the seller, and that the Defendants should pay the brokerage commission on behalf of the seller. Above all, according to the above testimony, G also paid the brokerage commission of KRW 20,00,00 to the Plaintiff.” The above facts are contrary to the Plaintiff’s argument that “G would not pay the brokerage commission to the Plaintiff as an individual on its own side, instead of reducing the purchase price,” and therefore, it is not recognized that the Defendants would have to pay the brokerage commission to the Plaintiff from the beginning. Accordingly, it is difficult to recognize that the Defendants’ assertion that the Defendants would have agreed to pay the intermediary remuneration to the Plaintiff.”

3. The judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.