1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 10,000,000 with respect thereto to the Plaintiff and the period from November 21, 2015 to November 21, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with C PP car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) between B and B.

B. The council of occupants' representatives of Defendant A apartment council (hereinafter "the council of occupants' representatives") is an autonomous management body consisting of the occupants of A apartment located in Songpa-gu Seoul and 65,563 households located outside 7 parcels of land (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"). The Defendant Daelim Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Defendant Daelim Industry") is a company that newly constructed the apartment of this case and completed it on July 2008, jointly with Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. and two companies.

C. Around January 31, 2012, the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives entered into a contract with Defendant 1’s assistant intervenors to entrust the management of the instant apartment by setting the contract period from February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2014.

In the construction of the new apartment of this case, the joint contractor, including the Defendant Company, failed to perform the part to be built according to the design drawing in the construction of the new apartment of this case, or constructed the apartment of this case with the defective construction or with the alteration of the plan differently from the design drawing, thereby causing defects such as rupture, water leakage, and water quality to the section for common use of the apartment of this case. Accordingly, the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives continuously requested the joint contractor

In particular, in the case of the defendant company, the council of occupants' representatives of the defendant company urged the defendant company to repair defects in common areas, such as landscaping, parking lot rupture, water leakage, etc. on October 30, 2012, but the defendant company did not comply therewith.

E. B parked the instant vehicle in the 236-dong and 2nd underground parking lot of the instant apartment (hereinafter “instant parking lot”), but around December 12, 2012, “the instant parking lot was destroyed by the painting, etc. of the instant vehicle, which was parked away from cement water through the crack of the instant parking lot.”