A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The ordinary telephone finance fraud organization establishes a call center in China, and takes part in the roles of "China's total policies" and "Korea's total policies" that instruct withdrawal, remittance, and solicitation of bankbooks, "book of withdrawal" that communicates with Chinese union members, "book of withdrawal" that transfers the withdrawn money to China, "book of remittance" that recruits the head of passbook to be used for committing a crime, and "book of solicitation of passbooks" that recruits the head of the Tong to be used for committing a crime. In preparation for the tracking of the investigation agency, the organization did not know one another. However, among them, there is a successive conspiracy relationship between them as to the commission of the phishing fraud crime.

On March 2016, the Defendant was a ship of Chinese nationality, and the Defendant was waiting in the vicinity of the steel station located in Ansan, through a telephone from the friend of “C,” a branch located in China around March 2016, and was waiting in the vicinity of the steel station located in Ansan.

If a secret number is confirmed and cash is withdrawn and remitted to a designated account, 10-150,000 won will be paid.

“The proposal received and accepted it, and conspired in order to play a role in withdrawing the telephone financial fraud organization.”

On April 10, 2016, the name Buddhistist made a false statement to the victim D by using the Kakakao Stockholm case and telephone at a non-displacement on April 10, 2016, ordering the victim D to deposit money in advance because he/she would only arrange to transfer money. The deposit money and the refund money are deposited.”

However, even if a person who is not aware of the fact receives money from the injured party, there was no intention to arrange for the remaining conditions or return the reserved money or deposit.

Ultimately, the Defendant, in collusion with his name in collusion, deceiving the victim as above, and by deceiving him from the victim, 10,000 won in the name of the Saemaul Treasury account (F) in the name of E on the same day, and 1,90,000 won in the name of G, 1,000 won in the name of deposit, etc. three times in the name of G (H).