1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. There is no dispute between the parties to the facts of recognition, or the following facts are acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire arguments in the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 10, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3.

가. 토지매매약정의 체결 (1) ㈜샤이나건설 외 1개사는 군사시설보호구역안에 위치한 파주시 B 일대 부지를 매입하여 공동주택건설계획을 추진하기로 하고서 그 부지의 일부로 2007. 6. 26. 피고와 피고 소유의 별지 목록 기재 부동산들을 매매대금 20억 원에 매수하는 토지매매계약에 앞서 토지매매약정(이하 ‘이 사건 매매약정’이라 한다)을 체결하였다.

(2) As to the contract amount of the instant purchase and sale agreement, “one million won per day, simultaneously with the agreement,” Article 3 of the instant trade agreement provides that “the seller” and “the buyer” shall not unilaterally terminate this agreement. This agreement stipulates, “The seller shall not make a contract with a third party after this contract, and shall pay the buyer the amount of the down payment if there is a cause attributable to the failure of the contract, and the buyer shall pay the buyer the amount of the down payment if there is a cause attributable to the failure of the contract.” However, this agreement becomes null and void unless the apartment house plan within the military installation protection area is finalized, and the principal amount of this agreement shall be paid to the buyer without the reason attributable to the failure of the contract” in Article 10 of the terms and conditions attached to the instant trade agreement.

(3) 같은 날 ㈜샤이나건설은 피고의 농협계좌로 이 사건 매매약정상의 약정계약금인 1,000만 원을 송금하였다.

(b) Assignment of claims after paragraph (1).