1. The Defendant’s decision on October 16, 2015 to reduce the compensation for bereaved families, which was made against the Plaintiff, shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) has worked at the C Team in Southyang-si.

B. On July 22, 2015, the Deceased: (a) confirmed the details of receipt of civil petitions on the day duty on the day duty; (b) processed C civil petition counseling and receipt by not later than 09:00; (c) reported the on-site work plan to the head of the department in charge by classifying and selecting civil petitions for treatment by C treatment group; and (d) patrol the civil petition site with government vehicles at around 10:00 after reporting it to the head of the department in charge.

At around 10:40 on the same day, the deceased saw a pain on the breast side of the same day, and received a doctor's opinion that there is no problem that the deceased was receiving treatment because she was admitted to a neighboring hospital, and performed a day in the morning.

At around 12:45 on the same day, the deceased was on board a parked vehicle, and then complaining of a serious chest and respiratory difficulty while getting on the parked vehicle, and the staff at the same time requested emergency patients and emergency rescue and relief measures to the 119 Safety Center, and was sent to the Hanyang University Emergency Hospital via the 119 Rescue and Relief Vehicle.

In the end, on July 25, 2015, the deceased died as a direct death, on July 25, 2015, since he was diagnosed with acute marrymosis and was under medical treatment, but his state was not restored.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Around August 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of bereaved family's compensation under the Public Officials Pension Act, and the Defendant made payment to the Plaintiff on October 16, 2015, and the following purport: “The deceased's death constitutes death for official duties; however, as a result of the health examination, neglecting health care, such as making excessive smoking without receiving appropriate treatment in a timely manner while there is a risk factor of acute heart color, is deemed to have caused the deceased's death, taking into account medical opinions, Article 62 of the Public Officials Pension Act and Article 15 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act shall apply to the gross negligence under Article 62 of the Public Officials Pension Act and Article 53 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, and the payment shall be made by reducing