Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above punishment against the Defendants for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, around September 30, 2014, ordered the victims E to undertake the construction of the (State) F church North Korea Kablebook operated by the Defendants to the victims in the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building D, and immediately started the construction, and the said construction will be ordered if the deposit is KRW 25 million.

A false statement was made.

However, in fact, the above North Kapet Corporation received this order from G (State), which is entitled to contract the above construction from G (State) to G (State). The F did not have any funds to deposit money to G (State) in the situation where it was operating with others without any particular funds, and the damaged party did not have any intent or ability to request the Corporation to pay the funds to the injured party on account of the fact that it was used for operating expenses and debt repayment of the F (State).

The Defendants, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, deposited KRW 25 million in the name of the Corporation as the total amount of KRW 5 million on September 30, 2014, and KRW 25 million on October 17, 2014, from the victim’s (I) bank account in the name of HF.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

2. On October 31, 2014, Defendant A lent KRW 1 million to the said victim, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, a church North Kapeta to the lower party, and made a false statement.

However, the fact was that the victim did not have the intention or ability to leave the construction as stated in the preceding paragraph.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim, under the name of the J Union account (K) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first and second public trial records

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each legal statement about the witness A and B in part;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the Defendants by the prosecution.