The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant C, jointly and severally with Defendant B, KRW 10,500,00,000.

Basic Facts

A. A. Around December 2015, Defendant C’s investment 1) sought an investment explanation from Defendant C’s representative of Defendant C’s farming association (hereinafter “Defendant C”) to the effect that “if Defendant C’s redevelopment project, etc. is being carried out, it would pay a lot of profits” and thereafter, the Plaintiff began to attract investors in Defendant C’s farming association from that time.

2) Around April 2016, the Plaintiff received an explanation and solicitation from Defendant B to make an investment in Defendant Corporation with the foregoing content, and accordingly, received an explanation and solicitation on April 30, 2016 from Defendant Corporation’s account, and accordingly, received KRW 50 million from Defendant Corporation’s account.

6.17.42 million won, and the same year.

6. On May 21, 201, KRW 100,000 deposited KRW 100 million (hereinafter the above KRW 100,000,000,000) (hereinafter “instant investment money”). 3) The Plaintiff received a total of KRW 25,00,00 from May 2016 to October 2016 from the Defendant’s corporation as the dividend.

B. The Plaintiff’s investment in the Plaintiff’s stocks E is KRW 10,000,000 on the following week, although the Defendant B’s emergency stocks of “E” (hereinafter “E”) are now KRW 10,000 per share.

If shares are sold immediately after three months, profits shall be guaranteed up to three times the investment amount if the shares are omitted.

Upon receipt of the explanation and solicitation of investment in E’s shares, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 20 million on October 10, 2016, KRW 20 million on the account under Defendant B’s name, KRW 5 million on October 11 of the same year, KRW 5 million on October 5 of the same year, and KRW 60 million on October 19 of the same year (hereinafter the above KRW 60 million on September 19 of the same year, and collectively referred to as “each of the instant investments”). D. D. of the instant investment amount, including the Defendant’s corporate investment amount.

The plaintiff's request for the return of each of the investment funds of this case and the return of part of the defendant B 1) The plaintiff cannot trust each of the above investment businesses according to the defendant B's recommendation.

I think, from the end of October 2016, the return of each of the instant investments to Defendant B.