Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a spouse who was married with E on December 21, 2003 and completed a marriage report. A. The Defendant is a spouse who was married with E on December 21, 2003.

On July 4, 2012, around 18:30 on July 4, 2012, the Defendant provided a single sexual intercourse with B in a room where it is impossible to find out the head of Gelan Nam-gu F.

B. On August 1, 2012, at around 18:30, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B and once in a room where it is impossible to find out the family room inside the Gelan Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

C. On October 2012, 18:30 on the first day of October, 2012, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B and once in a room where it is impossible to know the family room within the Gelannam-gu, Ulsan-gu. F.

On February 1, 2013, at around 18:30, the Defendant provided two sexual intercourses with B in a room where it is impossible to find out the head of Gel in Ulsan-gu F.

E. On April 10, 2013, around 18:30 on April 10, 2013, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse two times with B in a room where it is impossible to find out the room located in Ulsan Nam-gu F.

Accordingly, the defendant was sent to the above B more than seven times.

2. Defendant B was aware that the above spouse was a spouse, and the above time and place were sexual intercourses with A seven times as above, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Defendants’ statutory statement law

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that Article 62 (1) (including the fact that it is against the law) of the Criminal Act is in excess of the sentence;