The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged:

A. On August 6, 2012, around 02:00, at the “C” point of the “C” located on the first floor of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si B, for the reason that the business operation of the Defendant changed, the victim D (the victim 27 years old, south) collected and damaged the interest equivalent to KRW 110,000 in the market price kept at the above main point, and the fire extinguisher was set up at the wall at the entrance of the main point at around 02:10 on the same day, and then, at around 02:10 on the same day, damaged its utility by damaging the property equivalent to KRW 231,00 in repair cost, 441,00,000;

B. Although a foreigner staying in Korea has always a passport, etc., he/she must do so.

On the same day as stated in the port, at around 02:25, a police officer of the Suwon Police Station Edistrict called out upon receipt of a report at the same place violates the duty to carry and present a passport, etc., although the police officer requested to present a passport, etc. in relation to his/her duties.

2. According to the records, G’s personal information, such as the Defendant’s name, is stolen while being investigated by the investigative agency of this case, and the Defendant’s personal information is committed as if he/she was the Defendant. As such, G’s personal information is copied by the above G.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case shall be effective against the above G, who is the mother, and it shall be deemed that there is no legitimate prosecution against the defendant, who is the mother. However, since the defendant, who is the mother, actually continues a lawsuit and has the status of the defendant in form or appearance, it is found that the defendant did not have a legitimate prosecution, it shall be dismissed by applying Article 327 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act mutatis mutandis.