All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the reasons for appeal by the prosecutor are unreasonable because the sentence of the court below is too uneasible.

2. The judgment of this case is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too somewhat weak or unreasonable in full view of various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the defendant took part in the remittance of the crime and acquired money from the victim. The defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment due to the same kind of crime, despite the fact that the defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment, the defendant committed the crime of this case.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal of this case by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.