1. From 2,100,000 to 2,100 won, the Defendant is among the first floor of the real estate indicated in the attached real estate indication from July 12, 2015.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as to facts.

원고는 2015. 4. 10. 피고와 사이에 별지 부동산의 표시 기재 부동산의 1층 중 별지 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (가)부분 약 39㎡(이하 “이 사건 주택”이라 한다)를 임대차보증금 300만 원, 월 차임 45만 원, 임대차기간 2015. 4. 11.부터 2017. 4. 10.까지로 정하여 임대차(이하 “이 사건 임대차”라 한다)하는 계약을 체결하였다.

B. After that, the Plaintiff delivered the instant house to the Defendant around April 11, 2015. On May 11, 2015, the Plaintiff received only one-month rent from the Defendant residing in the instant house and received no rent thereafter.

C. On July 15, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a proof of the content that the instant lease contract was terminated on the grounds of the rent delay, and the said proof reached the Defendant around that time.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, since the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of content certification containing the declaration of intent to terminate the contract, the Defendant’s restoration to its original state from May 11, 2015, which was not paid by the Defendant from the Plaintiff at KRW 2.1 million to KRW 3 million of the lease deposit of this case.

7. It is the remainder after deducting a total of KRW 900,000 from the rent for two months up to November.

From July 12, 2015 to July 12, 2015, the remaining money calculated by deducting the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 450,000 per month from the time the delivery of the instant house is completed is obligated to deliver the instant house to the Plaintiff.

B. As to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant is obligated to allow the Plaintiff, a lessor, to use and benefit from the instant house for residential purpose.