Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2, 2017, the Defendant refused to withdraw from the Defendant received a demand to change its business from the injured party C (M, 60 years of age) who was on the second floor of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul (M, 0 years of age).

However, the defendant does not respond to it, and leads to a disturbance, and continues to go to the defendant in the above singing practice place.

It rejected the victim's request for withdrawal without justifiable reasons, such as commencing his or her own conduct or dispute.

2. On October 2, 2017, around 05:10 on October 2, 2017, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s property by drinking the balle, which is attached to the window of the driver’s seat of the Fro-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed W-Wed-Wed-Wed W-Wed-Wed, so that the market price is unknown

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same date and time as indicated in the above paragraph (2), and at the same place as indicated in the above paragraph (112, H saw the Defendant’s arms, and prevented the Defendant from destroying property as referred to in the above paragraph (2). The Defendant: (a) the police officer belonging to the Seodaemun-gu Police Station G police box called out after receiving 112 reports; and (b) the above Ha Ha saw the Defendant’s body part faced with the above Hambn-picked car; and (c) the police officer belonging to the above G police box arrested the Defendant as an offender for the crime of destroying property and attempted to patrol the Defendant to board the Defendant at the same time; (d) the said I’s chest’s chest was pushed over the bottom of the J’s slope attached to the above G police box; and (e) the Defendant put the Defendant over the floor by drinking once, having the shouldered his hand on the left part of the J, and put the Defendant on one stop.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 reporting process and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, I, J, and H;

1. Photographss of damaged vehicles;